Tuesday 28 November 2017

Misleading News

I recently came across this article.

The title is "Bigger turnout in Australia's same-sex marriage vote than in Brexit".
The url even contains "more-people-have-voted-in-same-sex-marriage-vote-than-brexit".

This is wrong.

The basis for the incorrect information? For the Brexit vote, 72% of the UK population voted. For Australia's same-sex marriage vote, supposedly 79% of Australia's population voted.*

If you haven't spotted the problem yet, you definitely need to keep reading.

Percentages do not mean the number of people. The UK has a population of 65.5 million people. Australia has a population of 24.5 million. This means:

For Brexit: 72% of 65.5 million = 47.16 million people voted (which is already more than the entire population of Australia).
For Australia's same-sex marriage: 79% of 24.5 million = 19.36 million people voted.

Therefore, we can easily see that more people voted in Brexit than in Australia's same-sex marriage.
Therefore, the 'bigger turnout' was clearly for Brexit (because that implies number of people).
And this is just from using basic high school maths.

This is just one of many instances where news reports will carefully word things to give you the impression that the statistics are saying something they're not.

The conclusion: people should always question information they see in the news, especially if the organisation calls itself "Pink News".



* The vote was postal, and there are reports of people collecting and sending off multiple voting papers, essentially nullifying the result.

Sunday 26 November 2017

Micro$oft updates and invasiveness

I'd been putting off updating my computer... Micro$oft always has errors when they 'update', so I try to leave it a few days so that the 'fix' becomes available and I can 'update' and 'fix' the update at the same time.

Back in the day, you would buy your computer, and if you didn't need access to the internet, you wouldn't need to update anything really. Sure, your programs might get out of date, but they would still work.

Alas, those days are over... so many programs run on a 'subscription' basis. This means that you can't just buy the program and use it forever. Instead, you have to pay for the program and continue paying in order to receive the services. My old Microsoft Office 2003 was awesome. But because they've stopped updating older versions, I've had to upgrade... to Micro$oft Office 365, where I have to pay monthly or yearly subscription. Hence, "Micro$oft".

But the latest issue is with Windows 10.

The updates are incredibly annoying. I don't just mean in terms of the time it takes to download and install them, I mean what they actually do to the computer.

Now, every time my computer updates, I have to spend additional time going through the settings to find out what Micro$oft have sneakily changed... without my permission. Their argument would be that by buying their product, I am therefore subject to their way of doing things. I understand that, but I still think it's wrong. I'm still thinking of changing from Windows to Linux.

This latest update has installed something called "Mixed Reality Viewer". I have no idea what it is (maybe one day I'll be curious enough to investigate), but what disturbed me is that it automatically enabled my camera and microphone.

I take privacy very seriously. A recent report of Google tracking people, even without their permission, is something I had already suspected. These huge companies are all about the money. This is why so many services have become subscriptions. But it also means that they can make more money by selling your data. Companies always want to collect data to know how to advertise more effectively. Google Ads, for example, is tailored to what you may be interested in.

Facebook is possibly the world's largest personnel database. Despite me not being on it, I can still access a lot of information that other people put up there. Why wouldn't the CEO of such a major company be working with governments to make more money? Facebook can sell information. Micro$oft can give remote access to to you computer's microphone and camera.

All because some 'update' did something without people knowing.



UPDATE:
In this latest update, Micro$oft also changed my default video player back to their "Films & TV" program. Again, forcing customers to use their products instead of third-party products.

Saturday 25 November 2017

A good reason to come off Facebook

I came off Facebook many years ago. I firmly believe my life is better for it.

But for the multitudes who are still on it, here's a word of warning...

- In Pakistan, you can be killed for 'blasphemy'. As it's a Muslim country, this means anything against Islam or Mohammed.

- Pakistan asked Facebook for help in identifying 'blasphemers'. Basically, anyone who supports a view or religion which does not hold Islam in the highest regard.

- Facebook said, "Yes." (Another article here.)

- A few months ago, a Pakistani was sentenced to death over comments he made on Facebook.


Pakistan does not have freedom of religion. Facebook is supporting this. Watch what you say, or come off Facebook.

Here's a video about it.

Wednesday 15 November 2017

Why the Leftist reaction is juvenile

Since the election (democratically, I would add) of Donald Trump in the US, there has been an incredible amount of activism from those who do not support him.

It's juvenile (immature and childish, for the educationally-challenged). Here's why:

1. In a democratic society, you vote to decide the government. Not everyone will vote for the person who gets elected, but that's democracy. To react against the elected leader is just like the child who doesn't get his/her* own way.

2. 'Social' issues such as transgenderism, gun control and race equality have dominated the media. These are all things that the political Left would like to change. The Left has become quite vocal about it, much like the little child who feels wronged by a parent and tries to justify his/her* preferences in the hope that he/she* can still get what he/she* wants.

3. Leftist groups have become very politically active, not only holding protests, but actively rioting. They have slandered, abused and shut down (also called 'no-platforming') people who don't share their views. They have vandalised property and even caused injury during such riots. This is just like the hormonally imbalanced teenager who thinks, "Punish me? Put me in my place? I'll show them!" It's essentially a bully tactic. It's a behaviour trait of the selfish brat who can't take correction and decides to cause more wrong and harm in response.

4. Young people (teenagers, especially) will do whatever they can to get their own way. They come up with the most ridiculous of excuses for things. One example (and this is completely true) is of a girl at school who said, "It's really hot in here!" It was suggested that, since it was summer, she took her jumper off. She responded "I can't do that... I'm not wearing a shirt!" Why wasn't she wearing a shirt? Because she wanted to wear a pink bra to school. The pink bra is visible through the white school shirt, which would land her in trouble. In order to hide the pink bra, she wore her school jumper. But to wear a shirt and a jumper would be far too hot, so she decided to lose the shirt.

The result? No one could see her bra anyway, so no one knew it was pink. The whole excuse was... so that she could wear a pink bra, presumably to make some sort of statement that she will not be forced to wear a white bra.

The Left does the same thing. They come up with all sorts of reasons for their ridiculous viewpoints. This is why we now have to put with 50+ genders in some cases. They clutch at straws to find a professor who will do some sort of pseudoscience to 'prove' that there's more than just male and female.

5. Extreme 'equality' all started with gay marriage. The false premise that marriage is only about two people who love each other led people to flirt with the idea of two people of the same sex getting married. This led to questions about relationships and gender. Not only is marriage being redefined, but gender is too. In fact, why put limits on sexuality at all? Incest is now being discussed, because the premise is: 'if two people love each other...'. This is why it's a false premise. It's just like the child who says, "Why are you telling me to be quiet, and not the other people who are talking? If you were a fair person, you would make sure everyone was treated the same!" Unfortunately, the child conveniently forgets that they were shouting expletives at the top of their voice, and the other children were whispering quietly. The logical process is misguided.

6. Teenagers used to be renowned for thinking they know everything and adults know nothing, then realising (in their 20s) that, in reality, they were wrong. Hence the comment, "When I was 16 I knew everything. When I was 21 I realised how much my parents had learned in the last 5 years!" Unfortunately, we have a wave of millennials who were poorly educated, spent too much time with Facebook, Instagram, Tumblr, Twitter and countless other 'social media' applications^ that they didn't bother to further their education outside of the institution that gave them their 'free' and 'entitled' education. These people have therefore never learned that, as a teenager, they still had a lot to learn, and so they think that those teenage views are perfectly valid and completely rational. And they are encouraging the new wave of teenagers to believe the same.


It really is time for them to grow up.


* Because the reality is that there are only two genders or sexes: male and female. Sorry to bust the bubble.
^ I wonder how many young people nowadays realise that 'app' is just an abbreviation of 'application'?

Segregation resurgence

In order to have true equality between all people, during the 1800s and 1900s, many attempts were made to end the segregation of black people and white people. These steps were seen by society as progression.

An old idea of 'separate but equal' was shown to have failed: services and conveniences for black people were not well maintained and were often of lower quality. 'Separate' was not compatible with 'equal', and that is why we have the equality we have today. It's not perfect, but it's a lot better than how it was.

In the UK, there are concerns that there is not enough 'mixing' of race happening in universities:
"If we are to create a more tolerant UK society, where people are aware and respectful of cultural and ethnic difference, it is vital that greater mixing happens."

But it seems that a new wave of American young people - millennials, no less - have new, ground-breaking notions of a progressive society and a utopian future.

Their idea? In order for a society of equality and inclusion, there must be provision of 'safe spaces' for ethnic minorities.

To put it bluntly, segregation is now politically correct!!

Michigan University has a space for "black students and students of color to organize and do social justice work" [sic].

"California State University Los Angeles recently rolled out segregated housing for black students."

"North Carolina State University might create segregated student housing for African American women." (Essentially, segregation by race and sex...)

This is apparently seen as a step forward, part of a 'progressive' society.
There has long been a debate in the UK about exams getting easier (I know my exams were easier than those 20 years before me).

But when people believe that this 'easier education' (because they are entitled to education) is of the same standard of past generations... and so they don't bother to do their own research and logical thinking... we end up with a society of segregation and ideas like this:

The interdependence of black and white

I've recently seen some videos of "A day without white people" and "A world without black people".
Here are my thoughts...


If black people were to disappear right now, the world might look different, but it would still function (at least for a while).
If white people were to disappear right now, the world would probably descend into chaos much, much faster.

However, it's the roles of black and white people throughout history that has made the world what it is - better for some, worse for others. White people may well be more academically minded and may well have invented more things. But the white people only enjoy the current society because it is built on the shoulders of black people. More precisely, modern civilisation is built by the hands of black people.

If it wasn't for the slave trade, for the forced labour of black people by whites, then the world would be very different. Cheap labour for the whites to prosper: if equality was there from the start, the "American Dream" would be impossible. I'm not saying the slave trade was right, just that it's history and we can't change that.

But underpaid labour still exists: sweatshops still exist; white people taking advantage of less developed countries which are primarily black. In Western countries like America, the inequality is negligible, brought to the fore because of people who seem annoyed to have to work hard to reach their 'dreams' (or even to survive).

But the real inequality is how the West treats the Third World. I have seen first hand how a group of white people (Americans, and supposed 'Christians' too) wanted to take over an orphanage organisation in Southern Africa and the way they did it was essentially by saying, "We'll give you the money you need to survive if we are in charge and you do things our way, otherwise we'll give you nothing." Notice that it's only the money to survive, not to thrive.

And that's the problem. The West (white majority) use the less developed countries to their own ends, allowing them to 'survive' but nothing more. The next time you go to the supermarket, look at where your food comes from. If it's from a less developed country, it's probably produced by something akin to slave labour.

For true equality to exist throughout the world right now, everyone living in a developed country would have to give something up. Not just rich people, but everyone. A black community in USA is far better off than the slums in India.

The world is what it is. It's not perfect, and it never will be. We all need to help make it a better place, but the only way to really make a difference is by sacrifice. No one should exploit anyone else for personal gain. The current tend (including Black Lives Matter) is an attempt to exploit the wealthy for their own ends. We need to turn our focus onto ourselves: what can I do to make the world a better place? What can I do to make the life of someone worse off than me just a little bit better?

Stop ranting at the rich. Stop ranting at the whites. Lead by example.

Saturday 11 November 2017

It's a sad day...

I recently came across this news story (also here). I was shocked.

Here's the gist:
- A bunch of students became offended, resulting in a weekend camping retreat being cancelled.
- The students were offended over... a banana skin.
- The reason for the offence was... hate-crime/racism.

SERIOUSLY?!?!

The cause was that there was no rubbish bin nearby. The person eating the banana (immaturely) threw the skin at a tree. "Immaturely" because he should have just held onto it until he found a bin, (not because the action could be seen as racist).

He even said: "Although unintentional, there is no excuse for the pain that was caused..."

The problem of littering should be treated for what it is. Not treated as an act of racism.

Some people need to travel around. Get some cultural experience outside of the USA. Many countries have litter lining the streets, including banana skins. No one gets offended by it.

I honestly can't believe that some parts of the world have to this. And then... I also found this article: another piece of trash causes offence.

But I can't work out what's upsetting me more:
- that people are getting offended over trash,
- that the police actually waste time looking into these incidents, or
- that such things are even newsworthy.

A message for every other country of the world (especially my homeland, the United Kingdom):
Please don't become this dumb!!

Friday 10 November 2017

The current problem with USA

I think this video illustrates nicely the current problem in America between pro- and anti-Trump supporters. I'm not pro-Trump, I'm just anti-stupidity. Following the bandwagon because it seems 'trendy' with the people around you is idiotic in supposed 'free countries'.

Thursday 9 November 2017

Transgender Law Concerns

The following article is taken from here. It is a talk from a meeting which was held in the House of Commons on October 31st, 2017. It is reposted with permission.
--------------------
Self-Declared Gender Identity: The Impact on Children and Adolescents
by Stephanie Davies-Arai, Transgender Trend

I would also like to express my thanks to David Davies MP for setting up this event and to everyone for attending. I will be speaking on behalf of parents of all political persuasions and I would like to express their gratitude too.

The parents I am representing are not the ones you see celebrated in the media. I speak for those who describe their experience as akin to having a son or daughter lost to a cult, with a devastating impact on siblings and on the family as a whole.

These parents are not bigoted, they are caring parents who would describe themselves as liberal and tolerant, parents who would always love and support their child no matter what the outcome.

I also speak to urge caution on behalf of the children of this generation who are caught up in the teaching of a new rigid, anti-science belief system presented to them as fact. [1]

If Gender Identity is established in law as a Protected Characteristic, it will apply to children of any age. But a child’s identity is not fixed: it changes over time, and it is shaped by factors like parental approval and societal influences. If all trusted adults are reinforcing daily a little boy’s belief that he is really a girl, this will have an obvious self-fulfilling effect. Puberty blockers supply the ‘answer’ to the created fear of a puberty he now believes to be the ‘wrong’ one.

Almost all children on blockers progress to cross-sex hormones at age 16. [2] Very few come off this path of increasingly invasive medical treatments once they are on it and so-called ‘social transition’ is the first step. This approach clearly works to prevent normal resolution of childhood gender dysphoria and foster persistence of opposite-sex identity.

While trans activists call for the de-medicalisation of ‘transgender,’ in the case of children they campaign aggressively for social transition, blockers and cross-sex hormones at ever earlier ages.[3]

The surge in sex hormones at puberty triggers the enormous changes in the teenage brain which don’t complete their job until the mid-twenties. [4] The brain /personality is not fully-formed until then. The effects of blockers on adolescent brain development are unknown [5] although studies on adults, including men taking the drug for prostate cancer, indicate risk of memory loss, depression and cognitive impairment. [6] Recent reports from the US indicate long-term serious health effects for women who were administered blockers for precocious puberty, such as excruciating muscle and bone pain, depression, weakness and fatigue. [7]

Preventing a child’s sexual development in early puberty, followed at 16 by cross-sex hormones, results in sterility as viable eggs or sperm have not developed. [8] These children are prevented from ever experiencing puberty: hormones can only superficially feminise or masculinise secondary sex characteristics, they cannot create the puberty of the opposite sex. Risks of cross-sex hormones include cardiac disease, high blood pressure, blood clots, strokes, diabetes and cancers. [9] Some significant effects are irreversible, such as male-pattern baldness and body and facial hair, masculinised voice and compromised fertility.

There have been no clinical research trials into the long-term effects of this treatment on children: this is a non evidence-based practice [10] to treat a non evidence-based diagnosis of being ‘a girl trapped in a boy’s body’ and vice versa [11] and this generation of children are the guinea pigs.

‘Transgender’ is an ideological label distinct from the clinical diagnosis ‘gender dysphoria.’ To call a child ‘transgender’ is to make both a claim that the child’s feelings represent material reality and a prediction about that child’s future: they will not change.

An analysis of all published research studies of children with ‘gender dysphoria’ shows that 80% will naturally come to be happy as the sex they were born [12] and this is true of even some of the most severe cases, we can’t know which children will persist and which will desist.

Opposite-sex identity in childhood is overwhelmingly predictive of gay or lesbian sexual orientation in adulthood, not transsexualism. [13] Affirming a child’s ‘gender identity’ can therefore be seen as gay conversion therapy by another name.

There has been an almost 1000% increase in children referred to the Tavistock clinic in London over the past 6 years. [14] These figures are inflated by the unprecedented rise in the number of girls – nearly 70% of the figure overall and over 70% of adolescent referrals last year. [15] By comparison, in the late Sixties 90% of adult transsexuals were male. [16]

We are aware that teenagers and young adults are susceptible to indoctrination, brainwashing and social contagion which is why we block online anorexia and self-harm sites. The internet, however, is chock-full of Tumblr bloggers and Youtube vloggers with hundreds of thousands of followers, who are selling vulnerable young people the myth of transformation through cosmetic alteration of their bodies, including amputation of healthy body parts, and a lifetime’s dependency on powerful off label hormones.

Recent reports of girls’ mental health indicate that girls and young women in the UK are in crisis. [17] Recently published evidence of the rate of sexual abuse and harassment in schools across the UK is a matter of national shame. [18]

Reports such as the recent Stonewall Schools Report [19] which indicate high suicidal ideation in ‘trans’ youth serve to cover up the fact that the vast majority of these youngsters will be teenage girls, now hidden in the category ‘trans boys.’

A PSHE teacher and Head of Year at a large comprehensive told me that in her school the kids who identify as ‘trans’ are, without exception, either lesbian, autism spectrum, have mental health problems or have suffered sexual abuse.

Parents are also concerned about the relentless gender identity propaganda their children are subject to today – across the media, [20] the internet and in schools, through organisations such as GIRES, Gendered Intelligence, Mermaids and Educate and Celebrate. The belief that gender is an innate identity is taught to children as truth, with no alternative views offered, in contravention of the UN Rights of the Child.

The ‘transition or suicide’ trope is repeated endlessly, against all Samaritans guidelines. There is no evidence that children will commit suicide if their parents fail to support them in taking a medical pathway, but of course the threat terrifies parents into feeling they have to.

There are over 260 trans youth support groups across the UK [21], which provide the ‘tribe’ where our most vulnerable young people will be accepted, maybe for the first time, as long as they identify as trans. All transgender organisations advertise their support for ‘gender non-conforming’ youth, sweeping up all children who are ‘different’ and don’t fit in.

These organisations claim to support ‘diversity’ but of course they do the opposite: a girl who rejects feminine stereotypes is transformed into a ‘boy’ who conforms to masculine stereotypes. Gender non-conformity is erased. Regressive and reactionary sex-stereotyping is being sold to young people as a progressive social justice movement.

To teach children that their ‘authentic self’ is something in their heads, split off from and in opposition to, the body, is to create gender dysphoria. Mind-body disassociation is recognised as a state of mental ill-health: in this case uniquely, it is presented as a normal variation and something to be celebrated. Mental health is based on being equipped to accept reality.

Since children have been taught that it is their ‘gender identity’ which makes them a boy or a girl and not their biological sex, calls to Childline from young people confused about their gender have doubled in a year – eight calls are now received every day from children as young as eleven. [22] The concept of ‘gender identity’ is clearly – and inevitably – causing mental health problems for young people.

Any child who suffers genuine gender dysphoria must of course be sensitively supported in schools and youth organisations. But teachers, professionals and other children cannot be asked to collude in the reinforcement of a child’s belief which contradicts reality. Recognition of biological facts is not bigotry.

When girls are told that a male classmate is now a girl, their sense of their own reality is shattered. If a biological male is a girl, then it is not female biology which makes you a girl, it is something else. Girls must look to a male classmate to find out the invisible magic quality they need, and the boy is given the power to define what a girl is. We cannot predict the long-term practical or psychological effects on girls taught to deny their own biology, without the right to even define themselves correctly as the female sex.

If teenage girls must consent to a male classmate using their toilets and changing-rooms they learn that their boundaries may be violated and their consent is unimportant. Girls learn that they are not always allowed to say ‘no.’ This is grooming; lessons on the importance of consent become meaningless.

Girls who are coached at school into ignoring their own discomfort and intuition may go on to put themselves in risky situations with any man who claims to be a woman, out of fear of being seen as transphobic.

In the case of public swimming pool changing rooms a young girl cannot name a male with a penis as a man: voyeurism and indecent exposure cease to exist as crimes if a man claims to be a woman. Normal child protection protocols effectively become unlawful.

I urge ministers to vote against the implementation of self-declared gender legislation, pending full investigation into the operation of transgender youth organisations and the impact on children and adolescents, including the implications for child protection and safeguarding, especially for girls. Expert testimony from professionals, including experts in child and adolescent development and psychology, and specific feminist analysis on the impact on girls is essential.

What I typically hear from parents is:

“I feel like I’m going through a death of my child and everyone is just cheering her on. When I found your website I cried with relief.”

But I am also contacted by young people themselves and I will end by quoting the most distressing message I received, from a young woman who asked simply this:

“Would you know how to get my body back? Would you know if anyone’s yet sued their doctor?”



References:
[1] https://www.gires.org.uk/classroom-lesson-plans/
[2] Hot Topics in Child Health conference, 12 June 2017, evidence from Dr Polly Carmichael, Tavistock clinic
[3] http://www.gires.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/GIRES-Young-People-Elsewhere-Observations-regarding-cross-sex-hormones.pdf
[4] https://science.howstuffworks.com/life/inside-the-mind/human-brain/teenage-brain1.htm
[5] http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444866417301101
[6] http://dailysignal.com/2017/07/03/im-pediatrician-transgender-ideology-infiltrated-field-produced-large-scale-child-abuse/amp/
[7] https://californiahealthline.org/news/women-fear-drug-they-used-to-halt-puberty-led-to-health-problems/
[8] http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/when-transgender-kids-transition-medical-risks-are-both-known-and-unknown/
[9] http://dailysignal.com/2017/07/03/im-pediatrician-transgender-ideology-infiltrated-field-produced-large-scale-child-abuse/amp/
[10] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26119518
[11] http://www.ozy.com/provocateurs/the-modern-master-of-sex/67782
[12] http://www.sexologytoday.org/2016/01/do-trans-kids-stay-trans-when-they-grow_99.html
[13] https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/262671
[14] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-35532491
[15] https://www.transgendertrend.com/from-adult-males-to-teenage-girls-the-movement-from-etiology-to-ideology/
[16] http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/women-and-equalities-committee/transgender-equality/written/19532.html
[17] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-41671060
[18] https://www.women2win.com/news/women-and-equalities-committee-chair-maria-miller-responds-girls-attitudes-survey-2017
[19] http://www.stonewall.org.uk/sites/default/files/the_school_report_2017.pdf
[20] http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/proginfo/2014/46/my-life
[21] https://www.tranzwiki.net/
[22] https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/dec/13/childline-eight-calls-a-day-gender-identity-issues-children-nspcc-helpline-transgender?CMP=share_btn_tw

Tuesday 7 November 2017

A dangerous road...

Can you believe that this guy managed to be allowed to use female changing facilities?!

It makes me wonder...

Would I (as a straight white male... you know, the lowest of the low...) would be able to get away with:
"Excuse me, but I identify as a black female lesbian."

Would I be allowed, or would I be done for 'hate speech'/'micro-aggression' towards blacks and/or females and/or lesbians?

YouTuber finds faith

I found this comment on YouTube:

This guy has clearly experienced the freeing power of God.

Christians need to stop limiting God's power: faith that is only beneficial when you die is substandard!

Saturday 4 November 2017

Faith and morality

I came across the following comment:

It's a classic example of a statement which sounds reasonable, but is, in fact, flawed.

Firstly, the internal logic.
This person finds the idea "disgusting" because "people do the most evil things based on faith."
The justification (the second statement) is not the only conclusion to the idea in the first statement: people also do the most amazing acts of kindness and compassion based on faith.

Secondly, the second statement itself.
The implication here is that people do evil things based on faith, therefore faith is wrong.
The truth is: people do evil things... and they will clutch at straws to find justification for it.

The very notion of 'evil' cannot exist without the prerequisite of a religion of some sort. If there is no spirituality at all, then no action can be considered 'evil', only a part of human nature.

But that's just semantics due to a bad word choice: the writer of the comment means that people do the most morally questionable things based on faith. So let's work with that.

People do evil (or morally questionable) things. That's all there is to it. The question is the justification:
Some people use faith as their justification.
Some people use their position in society as justification.
Some people use their negative experiences as a child as their justification.
Some people use their gender as justification (many women criticise men in ways they would find offensive if a man did the same to them).
Some people use their 'human rights' as justification.
Some people use the current trend of victimhood as their justification (such as SJWs being aggressive and racist towards white males).

Wednesday 1 November 2017

FGM in this post-modern era

It makes me wonder...

What kind of world do we live in where female genital mutilation (FGM) is criticised and lobbied against, and even made illegal by some governments, as if it was some form of evil...

... but sex changes for young people are encouraged?!?

In fact, I am told that I am a 'bigot' and a 'transphobe' if I do not encourage the sex change of a young person, despite the fact that it is, essentially, genital mutilation.

What an idiotic world.